cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Baiq Rika Ayu Febrilia
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
mpm@ikipmataram.ac.id
Editorial Address
Prodi Pendidikan Matematika FPMIPA IKIP Mataram Jl. Pemuda No 59A Mataram 83125
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Media Pendidikan Matematika
Published by IKIP Mataram
ISSN : 23383836     EISSN : 26570610     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics Other
MPM focuses on publishing articles related to research results as well as the results of literature studies on mathematics education. This type of research can be in the form of classroom action research, experiments, qualitative research or other research. The results of the study can be the results of the application of the model/method/approach, the use of learning media (props).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 6, No 1 (2018)" : 5 Documents clear
PENGGUNAAN METODE GIVING QUESTION AND GETTING ANSWER UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI LINGKARAN Fitriani, Wiwin; Sanapiah, Sanapiah; Pujilestari, Pujilestari
Media Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : IKIP Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (587.011 KB) | DOI: 10.33394/mpm.v6i1.1688

Abstract

The problems in mathematics needed a madel or appropriate learning methods, one of the models or methods that trains students to ask and answer questions in the learning process is a method of Giving Question and Getting Answers, one method that is expected to improve motivation and learning outcomes students. This study aims to improve motivation and learning outcomes of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 9 Satu Atap Pujut through the application of learning methods Giving Question and Answer Getting the subject matter of the circle in the academic year 2015/2016. This research was conducted in SMP Negeri 9 Satu Atap  Pujut central Lombok district. This research is a classroom action research (PTK) by applying the learning method Giving Getting Question and Answer. This study was conducted in two cycles. The results showed an increase in the average value of the evaluation results of students in each cycle is the first cycle the average value of the results of the evaluation study with classical completeness 67.06 75.86% and 74.17% student motivation with high category. While on the second cycle the average value of the results of the evaluation study with classical completeness 73.65 86.20% and 87.13% student motivation with very high category. From the data obtained, it can be concluded that the application of learning methods Giving Question and Answer Getting may improve motivation and learning outcomes of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 9 Satu Atap Pujut the school year 2015/2016.
PENGGUNAAN KARTU DOMINO MATEMATIKA DALAM FRAMEWORK ELPSA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA Akbar, Khairul
Media Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : IKIP Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (560.277 KB) | DOI: 10.33394/mpm.v6i1.1815

Abstract

This study aims to improve student learning outcomes on material eksponensial using mathematical dominoes in the ELPSA framework. This research is a classroom action research (CAR) conducted in two cycles. The subjects of this study were students IX-1 grade of  SMPN 2 Praya Barat Daya, Central Lombok District TP. 2017/2018 there were 28 people consisting of 15 female students and 13 male students. The research data collection instruments were Observation Sheet and Test Sheet. Indicators of research success are determined based on KKM 70 as a determinant of individual completeness with Classical Completion (KK) of 70%. The results showed that the average pre-action learning achievement was 30.71. After the action in the first cycle increased to 60.18. Student learning achievements in the first cycle increased by 29.47. In the second cycle the average student learning achievement was 76.07, which means an increase of 15.89 from the first cycle. Mastery learning / classical completeness in pre-action by 14.29% increased in the first cycle to 42.86%, and also increased in the second cycle by 71.43%. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the use of mathematical dominoes in the ELPSA framework on material eksponensial can improve student learning outcomes.
PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN LANGKAH POLYA BERDASARKAN GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD INDEPENDENT DAN FIELD DEPENDENT Tyas, Dewi Kristika Findia Ning
Media Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : IKIP Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (195.345 KB) | DOI: 10.33394/mpm.v6i1.1510

Abstract

Based on the experience of the researchers taught the subject of Economic Mathematics many students who have not been able to solve the problem solving. One alternative that can be used to solve the problem is by using Polya steps. When solving a mathematical problem, each student has a different way of thinking. The difference is possible because of differences in student cognitive style. The cognitive styles used in this research are Field Independent cognitive style and Field Dependent cognitive style. The material chosen in this research is the demand function, the Bid Function, the Savings Function and the Taxation Function. This research is a descriptive research with qualitative approach which aims to describe the problem solving ability of student mathematics using Polya steps in terms of cognitive style of FI and FD. Subjects in this research are students of VI semester of Mathematics Education Program. Technique of taking research subject is by purposive sample. The results showed that FI subject understood the problem well. In the planning step, the FI subject can analyze the information received. Subjects use previously learned information and solve problem-solving given to the problem as planned and check back on each question. The subject of FD can not receive information and understand the problems that exist in the problem and can not process information/do not understand the purpose of the problem. In the planning step, the subject of FD is unable to think how to solve the problem and is not accustomed to rechecking
PROFIL PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA KELAS VII MTS. QUR’ANIYAH PADA MATERI PECAHAN MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN FRAMEWORK ELPSA Juliangkary, Eliska; Zulkifli, Zulkifli
Media Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : IKIP Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (550.805 KB) | DOI: 10.33394/mpm.v6i1.1795

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini  adala,h untuk mengetahui pemahaman konsep materi pecahan pada siswa kelas VII MTs. Qur?aniyah. Penelitianini berlokasi di MTs. Qur?aniyah Batukuta Narmada Lombok Barat. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan metode survey kepada 20 siswa denga rincian 8 siswa laki-laki dan 12 siswa perempuan kelas VII Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018. Penelitian inimerupakan studi pendahuluan untuk melihat profil pemahaman konsep siswa selanjutnya digunakan sebagai analisis didaktik. Instrumenyang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes essay sebanyak empat soal.  Persentase pencapaian pemahaman konsep siswa untuk  indikator pertama yaitu menyatakan ulang sebuah konsep adalah 76,875%  indikator  kedua   yaitu  Menyatakan  konsep   dalam  berbagai  bentuk  representasi matematika adalah  76,25%,  dan  indikator  ke  tiga  yaitu  mengklasifikasi objek  menurut  sifat tertentu sesuai dengan konsepnya adalah 77,5%. Sehingga mendapatkan persentase pencapaian rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa adalah 76,875% dan berkategori Tinggi.
ANALISIS KOMPONEN LANGUAGE KERANGKA KERJA ELPSA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENGAJUKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR KOGNITIF Indriani, Kanti Warih Ade; Lutfianto, Fauzi Galih
Media Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : IKIP Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (453.17 KB) | DOI: 10.33394/mpm.v6i1.1469

Abstract

From the experience and observation of the author, during this learning of Mathematics generally only solve the problem alone, without familiarize the students to compile their own questions. So that students are less able to use their own language in solving the given problem. Language factor is less calculated as a possible one of the causal factors. ELPSA is a design/learning framework consisting of 5 component sequences, one of which is language. In learning ELPSA students are accustomed to asking productive and effective questions. This study aims to analyze the students' language skills in ELPSA learning design on the ability to issue Mathematical problems in terms of the cognitive thinking style. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this research was conducted in class VIII SMP 1 Maluk. Its divided into two groups. With one group is given conventional learning and one group get learning using ELPSA design. The instrument used is Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) to find out the type of cognitive style of each student and the Matter of Matter Problem Matter. Based on research that has been done, obtained results group of students reflective dominant than Impulsive students. In the student's ability to pose mathematical problems, Reflective student groups are better than Impulsive. While on the average score on the ability to solve Mathematics problems, Learning using ELPSA design is higher than learning without using ELPSA. That is, ELPSA learning design can help students develop language skills especially in raising math problems.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8, No 1 (2020) Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019) Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue